Previous Page  114 / 132 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 114 / 132 Next Page
Page Background

JOHANNES BRAHMS (1833–97)

Rhapsody in E- at major, op.

, no.

Six Piano Pieces, op.

When Robert Schumann wrote his

article

“New Paths” in the

Neue Zeitschri für Musik

, he

proclaimed the young Johannes Brahms the new

genius of German music. “Following the paths

of these chosen ones with the utmost interest, it

has seemed to me that, a er such a preparation,

there would and must suddenly appear someday

one man who would be singled out to make ar-

ticulate in an ideal way the highest expression

of our time, one man who would bring us mas-

tery, not as the result of a gradual development,

but as Minerva, springing fully armed from the

head of Cronus. And he is come, a young crea-

ture over whose cradle graces and heroes stood

guard. His name is

Johannes Brahms

.”

At the time of the article, Brahms was attract-

ing attention as a pianist in recitals throughout

Europe with the Hungarian violinist Eduard

Ho mann (known as Ede Reményi). e depth

of expression in Brahms’s playing particularly

a ected Schumann: “Even outwardly, he bore in

his person all the marks that announce to us a

chosen man. Seated at the piano, he at once dis-

covered to us wondrous regions. We were drawn

into a circle whose magic grew on us more and

more. To this was added an altogether inspired

style of playing which made of the piano an or-

chestra of lamenting and exultant voices.”

Many of Brahms’s compositions for the piano

come from these years of growing renown. Not

only did he compose three sonatas and numer-

ous sets of variations, ballades, and dances for

the solo piano, he also wrote for chamber com-

binations that included the piano. When Brahms

le his native Hamburg for Vienna in

, his

interest in solo piano composition shi ed from

the variation and dance forms to freer, more

improvisatory pieces. Nearly all of the later solo

piano works were titled capriccios, intermezzos,

rhapsodies, or fantasies. ese works come from

widely separated dates during his years in Vi-

enna: there were two sets of piano pieces from

– and four sets from

– .

Among Brahms’s last group of solo piano com-

positions were the Six Piano Pieces, op.

, and

Four Piano Pieces, op.

, completed in

at

his summer residence at Ischl, although some

may have been sketched earlier. e penultimate

collection was published later that year by Sim-

rock. Four pieces were entitled intermezzos—a

slower, lyrical type. e third piece is a narrative

ballade, and the h is a lyrical romance.

e valedictory op.

included three inter-

mezzos and a spirited rhapsody. In May

,

Brahms promised to send at least one unidenti-

ed intermezzo from op.

to Clara Schumann:

“It teems with discords.

ese may be all right

and quite explicable, but you may not perhaps

like them, in which case I might wish that they

were less right but more pleasing and more to

your taste. It is exceptionally melancholy, and

to say ‘to be played very slowly’ is not su cient.

Every bar and every note must be played as if

ritardando

were indicated, and one wished to

draw the melancholy out of each one of them,

and voluptuous joy and comfort out of the dis-

cords. My God, how this description will whet

your appetite!”

ALEXANDER SCRIABIN (1872–1915)

Fantasy in B minor, op.

Scriabin entered the class of Nicolai Zverev,

a noted piano teacher and former student of

Tchaikovsky, at the age of twelve.

e register

of Zverev’s pupils included another promising

young pianist, Serge Rachmanino . Scriabin,

older by a year, and Rachmanino pursued par-

allel paths in their musical training: both contin-

ued their studies at the Moscow Conservatory

with Sergei Taneyev and Anton Arensky, and, at

the time of their graduation in

, Rachmani-

no was awarded the rst gold medal in piano

and Scriabin the second gold medal.

However, the classmates progressed along two

dramatically divergent lines as composers, de-

spite the fact that both displayed a decided pref-

erence for piano composition. Rachmanino

was the traditionalist, the late-blooming Ro-

mantic, who combined technical virtuosity

with sweeping lyricism. Scriabin, on the other

hand, developed an unconventional style in

which radical, coloristic chord formations and

his mystical, theosophic beliefs were united. His

early compositions are indebted to the works of

Chopin, Wagner, and Liszt. Scriabin later broke

from tradition and explored new scale forma-

tions, harmonies, and the association of colors

and music.

Scriabin composed the Fantasy in B minor,

op.

, while serving on the faculty of the Mos-

cow Conservatory. His interest in the philoso-

phy of Friedrich Nietzsche and the theosophy of

Mme. Blavatsky had not yet emerged and would

not a ect his compositions until a er he le

the conservatory in

. A transitional phase

in Scriabin’s writing, leading from the lyricism

and ballade-like textures of Chopin to the highly

chromatic writing of Liszt and Wagner, may be

observed in this fantasy.

Poème

in F-sharp major, op. , no.

Resigning from the Moscow Conservatory in

May

liberated Scriabin from a demanding

set of duties that had severely diminished his

creative output. Income from teaching a large

class of composition students, though, had

helped support his own expanding family. His

wife Vera gave birth to four children between

July

and August

. A year later, during

his summer vacation in Obolenskoye, Scriabin

began an a air with Tatiana de Schloezer. When

Scriabin and his family le Russia to vacation in

Vézenaz, Switzerland, Tatiana took up residence

in a nearby village.

is professional independence and personal

turmoil coincided with a fruitful compositional

period. A er three fallow years, Scriabin once

again wrote freely for the piano in

, an

outpouring that began with the Sonata No. ,

op.

, and continued through a dozen more

opus numbers. Tatiana may have been the inspi-

ration behind his sudden productivity, but it was

Scriabin’s publisher, Mitrofan Belaiev, who was

the ultimate bene ciary.

In the fever of composition, Scriabin held Be-

laiev at arm’s length by reporting: “Among the

masses of music ( pieces, as I told you), there

are some very

big

things. … ey are complicat-

ed and need to be gone over especially carefully.

I have had much trouble with them.” A er the

sonata, small collections of preludes (opp. , ,

, , and ) alternated with

poèmes

(opp.

,

,

, and

), a waltz (op.

), mazurkas

(op.

), and etudes (op.

). Scriabin deliv-

ered this miraculous body of new works—what

scholar A.V. Kashperov called “pearls for the pi-

ano”—to Belaiev in St. Petersburg on his name

day (November ).

The last known photograph of Johannes Brahms

Alexander Scriabin

RAVINIA MAGAZINE | AUGUST 20 – AUGUST 26, 2018

112