“Meanwhile I am composing six easy clavier so-
natas for Princess Friederike and six quartets for
the king, all of which Kozeluch is engraving at
my expense.” However, Mozart completed only
one sonata and three quartets. Almost one year
later, he con ded in Puchberg, “I have now been
forced to give away my quartets (that exhausting
labor) for a mere song, simply in order to have
cash in hand to meet my present di culties.”
ese works did not appear until a er Mozart’s
death, without a dedication to the Prussian king.
Was the “commission” a reality or a ruse? Surely
the cash-strapped composer would have bene-
ted from genuine royal patronage. Some spec-
ulate that Mozart invented the “commission” to
appease Puchberg (he was heavily in debt to his
Masonic brother) or to cover up a rumored af-
fair with an opera singer, perhaps Josepha Dus-
chek, who turned up “unexpectedly” at every
city on his journey.
Musical elements argue in support of an in-
tended royal patron. King Friedrich Wilhelm II
regularly participated as a cellist in performanc-
es of chamber music with his court musicians.
e rst “Prussian” Quartet in D major, .
,
spotlights the royal instrument in numerous
high-lying lines. Mozart also explored an un-
familiar popular idiom—simple
cantabile
mel-
odies and moderate tempos (three movements
are
Allegretto
and the “slow” movement is a me-
dium-paced
Andante
)—which may have posed
his greatest compositional challenge.
Instrumental dialogue, as exempli ed by the
rst-violin and viola exchange in the opening
Allegretto
theme, also forms part of the popu-
lar style. A second instrumental pairing, of cello
and second violin, continues this simple melod-
ic exchange in the secondary theme. e
Andan-
te
begins with a hushed ensemble idea, and then
the rst violin and cello engage in alternating
melodic phrases. Typical dance-like vigor char-
acterizes the
Menuetto
; Mozart spotlights the
cello in a contrasting
trio
.
e sparkling rondo
nale combines a cello refrain theme (derived
from the rst-movement melody) with a viola
counterpoint. Unable to sacri ce his sense of
cra completely to popular demands, Mozart
also manipulated this melody through inversion
and other contrapuntal devices.
ERNĆ DOHNN<I (1877–1960)
String Quartet No. in D- at major, op.
Ernő Dohnányi almost single-handedly upheld
musical standards in his native Hungary be-
tween the monumental careers of Franz Liszt
and Béla Bartók. His father, Friedrich, a pro-
fessor of mathematics and physics in Pozsony
(Bratislava) and an amateur cellist, oversaw
Ernő’s introduction to the piano. A promising
future was predicted for young Dohnányi, who
matriculated at the Royal Academy of Music in
Budapest in
.
Composition proved as attractive to Dohnányi
as the piano. e Piano Quintet No. in C mi-
nor, op. , elicited praise from the typically re-
served Johannes Brahms, who immediately ar-
ranged for performances in Ischl and Vienna.
Dohnányi met with Brahms several times before
the elder composer’s death in
.
Following his graduation, Dohnányi embarked
on toured throughout Europe, England, and
the United States. He joined the faculty at the
Hochschule für Musik in Berlin in
and
was named a professor in
. Seven years lat-
er, Dohnányi returned to Budapest to serve as
director of the Philharmonic Orchestra Society
and the Royal Academy of Music. e changing
political climate in Hungary forced Dohnányi to
leave his country. He settled in the United States
in
, serving on the music faculty at Florida
State University for a decade and becoming an
American citizen in
.
Hallmarks of Dohnányi’s style abound in the
String Quartet No. in D- at major, op.
(
): rich harmonies lightly tinged with chro-
maticism, compact themes with motives ripe
for development, and cyclic uni cation. Small
gestures embedded in the opening phrase pro-
vide material for the whole rst movement: a
pair of slow, rising pitches, a downward leap,
an ascending arpeggio, and a dotted rhythm.
Tempos change frequently.
e
Presto acciaca-
to
(“acciacato” means “crushed” or “squashed”)
is a
toccata
movement with a folk-like thematic
simplicity. A gentle melody provides contrast in
the middle of the movement. Quiet, expressive
writing introduces the nal movement. Animat-
ed sections spoil the tranquility. Toward the end,
themes from the rst two movements are heard
one last time.
ANTONN D9OĎ. (1841–1904)
String Quartet No. in E- at major, .
e astonishing nancial success of his rst pub-
lished scores made it very di cult for Dvořák to
avoid being typecast as a folk-inspired composer.
Johannes Brahms had recommended the young
Czech musician to his own publisher, Fritz Sim-
rock, who amassed a near fortune from sales of
the Moravian Duets (composed
; published
), the rst set of Slavonic Dances ( ), and
the Slavonic Rhapsodies ( ). Quite naturally,
the business-minded publisher longed for other
pro table ethnic works. Dvořák, on the other
hand, sought a wider representation of his art
before the public and promoted music in more
traditional genres to Simrock.
In the short run, Dvořák persuaded his publish-
er to issue only a small number of these standard
works. e select list included his String Sextet
in A major, .
( ), a work that received its
premiere in Berlin on November ,
, mak-
ing it the rst piece to be rst heard outside the
composer’s homeland. Before that public event,
the Joachim Quartet gave a private reading on
July ,
. is intimate recital in Joseph Joa-
chim’s residence also included another recent
chamber piece issued by Simrock—the String
Quartet No. in E- at major, .
.
A more complete musician emerged from every
page of the quartet, one possessing a sophisticat-
ed technique, mastery of form, and multi-dimen-
sioned expression.
e
Allegro ma non troppo
remains largely in a mode of restrained passion,
especially in its hymn-like episode during the
development.
is lyrical, emotionally concen-
trated vein returns in the
Romanze
. Further-
more, Dvořák attained a comfortable coexis-
tence of “Classical” and ethnic ingredients.
e
quartet includes an elegiac second movement in
Dumka
style, a soulful Czech folk piece in slow
tempo. Here, cello pizzicatos provide an evoca-
tive accompaniment to a minor-key “duet.” In
time-honored fashion, Dvořák contrasts this
mournful material with a lively
furiant
dance that
shi s rapidly between two- and three-beat rhyth-
mic patterns.
e
Finale
’s main theme likewise
pays homage to folk dance traditions, perhaps (as
Dvořák scholar Alec Robertson has suggested)
the reel-like
skočna
.
–Program notes ©
Todd E. Sullivan
(UQć 'RKQ£Q\L
AQWRQ¯Q 'YRď£N
JULY 30 – AUGUST 5, 2018 | RAVINIA MAGAZINE
99